...
http://www.buchhai.de/
http://www.boersenblatt.net/355561/template/b4_tpl_antiquariat/
start with small things. A little endurance for heating - the Marathon to follow, just wait balde.
The bottom line of the heading is unclear and ambiguous: the difference between "used" and
"sold out" books is not even a second glance much. We guess roughly what is meant, but it should be expected of the database maker is not (have to). - Similar to dumb it seems to us, though in this area, it has to do 95% of books already in the title between "CD" and "DVD" carefully distinguished. - The "Beta" refers certainly not on DVDs, but the Database as a whole, so one should it be used correctly. The word "keyword" is set to top it all even with three dots nonsensical, in the one box that your item should include the customer. here also supports the experienced database users, until he realizes that he is to this word as override . Such shenanigans are completely uncommon, lead to fundamental confusion and are extremely harmful. This is now more than just a blemish. - It also means more words are accepted, so the term "keyword" in the singular in itself false and misleading.
After entering search terms to customers in two broad lines, namely in the head as well as on the side, Neubuchangebote his set keyword match (his regards Google) unprepared (he does not know that he is showered with it until he search has started) literally slammed on the head. This is not only visually but also by its very nature a violation of the customer, a hideous intrusive - the user feels put in a pincer. The mechanism of G arotte is exacerbated by the slow rolling, or better applied by a roller of the two new booking promotional tapes. Again - this is disgusting, intrusive and, if the term may be used in the context of usability: indecent. I mean this and the following qualifications purely factual, they are by the nature of the work submitted and not the people behind them, not even on the company. I judge only and exclusively the W he k.
Until now we had more of venial sins.
downright absurd, as a kind of Dadaism, the website design, pure spoof the user therefore turns out to be carrying out the answer to the customer request. Because the accident worms at w + h had the idea to list the results of the detected databases separately. This is the use as a price comparison engine plain and simple - impossible. You can not! You can try this for yourself, and each user will agree with me, yet impractical, cumbersome and makes it even more meaningless does not make it!
That then the results within the databases are not even sorted by price, is now almost taken for granted. Although I certainly be lenient on this issue. Somewhat sensible can be solved Compare Prices of secondhand books only after the system, the Book Finder - applies - awesome. To different conditions, subtitles, etc.
What I find really frightening but (and in the ABA database, even in the new version and got very criticized), is the breaking of each title shot with the hateful link "more ... . This leads to very terrible click-orgies.
re more external, but very disturbing, are the usual hijinx like "Sorry, no image" as an obligatory side entry to each record stub. Frech and simply outrageous - I assess the work, not the people or the company, see above - is that injury to the user is being done by too little work here, almost sadistic, the pale green and the "trendy" low-toned tiny black guys. As far as the customers do not run it anyway, is w + h doing here really is, as we inadvertently accept gladly do bodily harm guilty. "Eyes, my dear little window ..." (G. Keller).
you still have an increase in installed, the orgasm, the peak of wickedness in usability - - the entire result field is, in the normal and usual window setting through scroll sidebar first presented as Minifensterchen , so an orgy must take place on the finger work on high and pushing down, even before the torture must begin with the "more" clicks at all ...
Here I break off. I urge every thinking person as witnesses on that this database is the ever imaginable summit of insolence and cruelty in terms of usability.
The makers of this structure must put up with these comments and the related warning against the use of their work . To add to the user through this work physical and nervous damage. to warn of damage is a civic duty.
For the first time since I evaluate websites and databases, I have given as a clear Endnote "6".
This is the most terrible, unbrauchbarste entity that can be imagined in the work area of the antiquarians in general.
0 comments:
Post a Comment