..
..
first Graphically it was
none of the beautiful in the country. We did, however, as booksellers, we have our "Wilhelmine Buchholz" on the shelf that the lack of outfit's only outside "was, and Dr. Frenzchen cheerfully look to the future could. And sure Paulitz colleague had some good ideas (such as the embedding videos) and a very good, namely the collection of extensive interviews with colleagues.
This was all the more enjoyable to read, as the booksellers there had indeed unravel before eXPert audience. The weaknesses and strengths of their personality and their business came between the lines clearly need to express, what are to have but intelligent booksellers do not worry, because in either case, however they presented themselves and their openness was well received among his colleagues and the result was on balance, very positive for the respective author.
The referencing of relevant press reports would diligently can take place, we would like to read more from the workshop of the clever editor. Something clearly guilty men should have been nominated, I still do not know who was who hangover. In antique shops are teeming of pussy cats.
I eyed the company had initially very critical, but he was sympathetic in recent times, also wrote some of my standards extremely brave readers' letters. The sudden end hits me hard, you'll see why.
who invested so much time in a project of this kind, it is not easy to sense. So I try not even stormchen to a continuation to move, because that's not the way to the North Sea to seek fickle back and forth. Roma locuta, causa finita.
second
The decision seems to be a colleague of, now we say, certain unresolved attitude to Dr. Beasley and his financial newspaper spin-off not to have been uninvolved. There is always the danger that a new medium einschießt to the old, yet the tone, that an "anti-industry trade journal" is created. Something you can pass through only when one is Mulzer and fun has to dismantle the Booksellers Association and Dr. Beasley. Otherwise it would be, as has stormchen surely right, a sad business, only the antipode of the financial newspaper network service be.
He complains now probably - God knows, quite rightly - the Eigensüchtigkeit and laziness of colleagues, many of whom support was to be expected. It was sad indeed, that not everything came in letters from readers from among the booksellers, I would have from those colleagues who are eager to write blogs, expected more cooperation.
stormchen course has had too little patience. With rapid See in Google, he had about his ranking may look forward and establish that this journal-like search engine, daily tracking special media positioned extremely high, with a long breath he would soon be Tagged "Books" seen at the forefront in Google and would have become a popular advertising medium.
third
With its decision to close the antiquarian book-Gazette, has brought me stormchen in a difficult position. I think a medium for booksellers and their customers is very important. The Antiquarian offshoot of the financial newspaper network service fulfills this task, I was indeed justified in detail in this blog. Upon closer inspection, the whole concept of the bibliophile print edition of "Off the Books" process completely for many years, really should be the title of "Scientific Body for special issues of book history." Also I have not written about enough.
If enough now not the network service is still the printed Monthly Bulletin of the practical needs of booksellers and book collectors, then there can be only one decision in planning a new bookseller medium - the texts of the new network service must be ordered, but changed little printed as a monthly magazine be.
I was hoping would come stormchen after some lead time on this very idea. Finally, the urges to yes. Each library users know that is "Off the Books" in addition to the magazine for Old Aramaic with the least-read specialized bodies, the folders are always blossom white and without any trace of crease. Not a good sign ... The level is simply lifted off too, the issues most appealing (if not exactly all the beasts 1933 hinausgeekelten colleagues to "immigrants" explained, but we let it), but difficult to read. What is then scattered by intervening "bookseller practice" reads the more inappropriate and clumsy.
The journal form for each bookseller medium so important, because the goodwill support of our industry in quite a high level in large and small libraries can be found.
The printing form is also important for those areas dealt with the beasts qua concept of his network little sheet: I am talking about the inclusion our customers in discussion and debate. The new medium would have to try to take a real ombudsman function between bookseller and customer.
we have once enough readers to collectors for the network and the printed output, then the advertising for the interesting colleagues. As another bridge I want to understand the co-consideration of the Library and Archives. We are there as a bookseller in the future rather involved even more than is currently the case anyway. We need to have a say, as in I & D program.
4th
Those who wish to participate in such a small media company, which is kindly invited me in correspondence to connect. would I need * urgent * colleagues who read texts fluently in
* Italian * English and
and occasionally translate from the sleeve.
Otherwise we'll have to see what we can make of the situation. Technical problems are reduced because I am familiar to some extent in the realm of computers to finding a * content * easily understood system. I have been all too complicated and too demanding. We need something for fanciers clubs or something.
We want stormchen sincerely for his work!
wirs must now address it myself. Somehow.
Thanks for the possible use of the image goes to interstein.de which owns the photo.
0 comments:
Post a Comment